Wayne Phinney

Well, I’m sure some of you have already had your fun, but many of us either can’t get ahold of a 360, or it’s just too early to pay that much. Still, this is interesting. There are some comparison images over at the [url=http://www.ga-forum.com/showthread.php?t=80139]Games are Fun[/url] forums showing a screenshot from the game and showing a picture of the real image from the real city. Some of them look so similar that I nearly can’t tell the difference. That’s just freaking amazing! That kind of detail is phenomenal.

Tetris DS!

January 11, 2006

Well, this seems great, but on the other hand, it’s not. I have a few different thoughts on Tetris DS.

For starters, it had better not have the slowdown issues of Tetris Worlds on the GBA. There’s NO excuse for a game to have slowdown when the original version in inferior hardware ran perfectly smooth, spinach green graphics or not.

Secondly, why must this use the touch screen? I see no reason for that. Sure, it’s nice that the touch screen is there, but some games just don’t need it. There had better be an option to not even use the touch screen.

But, the upside is that you will be able to play it on the Nintendo Wi-Fi Network. Playing Tetris against real people is much better than just playing with yourself (that’s right, I said it).

And finally, will it be worth $35 for a new Tetris game? Maybe it’ll only be $20. Couldn’t we be so lucky. I have no problem with paying full price for a newer version of an old game, but come on now. This is Tetris. Not much has changed with Tetris over the years, and that’s the way it should be. Sure, give it to us on a new platform, but don’t charge full price for it.

I’m eager to download The New Tetris on the Revolution. I never could get all the wonders on my N64.

Source – [url=http://www.gamespot.com/ds/puzzle/tetris/news.html?sid=6142135]Gamespot[/url]

Halo: Combat Evolved

January 11, 2006

Seems a bit late to be talking about [i]Halo: Combat Evolved[/i], but some of us are just late to the party every once in a while. I have owned an Xbox for a couple of years now, but I never did get around to playing [i]Halo[/i]. Even though millions of people love this game, I waited for it to hit $20 because it almost sounded like it was overrated. Combine that thought with the fact that a lot of shooters bore me if they don’t bring anything unique to the table, and you can almost see why I played [i]Halo[/i] for the first time last week.

My first piece of advice to myself is this: If a game sells millions and millions of copies, it can’t just be another of the same game within its genre. I thought [i]Halo[/i] would be just another shooter, and combine that with me preferring a mouse and keyboard for controls, and you can once again see my hesitation to play [i]Halo[/i].

Now, I’m sure I’m not the only one in this boat. Everyone has a genre that just doesn’t appeal to them so much, and they need an excellent game to come around to start enjoying that genre again. [i]Halo[/i] did this for me.

I only played [i]Halo[/i] in two sittings before I beat it (granted, on normal difficulty) because I was just that hooked. While it brought a few new things to the shooter genre that weren’t already big before, the real big thing that [i]Halo[/i] brought to us was an excellent storyline that really pulled you in. The more I played, the more I wanted to play. I just had to see what was going to happen next.

I think this is the first shooter in a long time that I really loved. While I’ve liked shooters like [i]Unreal Tournament[/i], [i]Max Payne[/i], [i]Doom 3[/i], etc., this is the first one in a very long time that I truly loved. [i]Halo[/i] really is every bit as awesome as everyone has told me. Why was I so hesitant to believe everybody?

Of course, the major gripe everyone had was the levels and that they all looked the same. It didn’t really bother me though since an unnaturally made structure is likely to look similar all over. It just makes sense from a cost standpoint that every structure would be made in a similar fashion.

I guess the reason I am writing this piece today is because I know I’m not alone. I’m sure there are a few other people out there like myself who don’t like shooters as much as other genres. Perhaps they’ve stayed away from [i]Halo[/i] because they don’t like shooters on consoles, and perhaps for some reason they didn’t bother to get it on the PC.

Either way, anyone who has yet to play [i]Halo[/i] and wants to have some fun with a truly awesome shooter should really check it out. It’s only $20 now, which means that you can get it for even less used. Forget for a moment that you’re not too fond of shooters. Forget for a moment that it was designed for the Xbox. Forget any preconceived notions that you may have about this game. You really owe it to yourself to at least try it out. I finally did, and I honestly wish I had tried it sooner.

[i]Halo[/i] is one of those games that I should have purchased the second I got an Xbox. From now on, I will not hesitate to try out new games that the whole world seems to enjoy. Odds are, if millions of people like the game, there’s good reason for it.

This is quite an interesting look back and controllers of the past, and naturally, at the Revolution’s controller. For those who haven’t gotten enough Revolution controller goodness, this is another piece well worth taking a look at.

Source: [url=http://www.next-gen.biz/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1980&Itemid=2]Next-Gen.biz[/url]

Halo 3 will ship!!!

January 10, 2006

When it’s done that is. 🙂

According to Bill Gates himself, Halo 3 doesn’t have any sort of release date and it will ship when Bungie is done making it. Apparently when he said that Sony was going to run right into Halo 3, he didn’t mean it would literally launch the same day, but rather he was hoping it would already be out by the time the PS3 launches, thus hurting their sales.

Either way, I’m excited.

Source: [url=http://www.gamesindustry.biz/content_page.php?aid=13960]GamesIndustry.biz[/url]